42nd National Criminal Law Program

Volume I (Tabs A-N):

• Tab A. Reshaping Common Law Rules to Reflect Changing Values
• Tab B. Foundation Principles: Relevance, Materiality and Admissibility
• Tab C. Do We Need Exclusionary Rules Beyond Reliability?
• Tab D. Competence and Compellability
• Tab E. Lectures on Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements
• Tab F. Is it Hearsay?
• Tab G. It is Hearsay: Determining Admissibility
• Tab H1. Using Technology to Advance Your Case in the Courtroom
• Tab H2. The Common Purpose [Co-Conspirator's] Exception to the Hearsay Rule
• Tab H3. Fresh Evidence on Appeal
• Tab H4. The Acquisition and Use of Third Party Records
• Tab I. Right to Counsel
• Tab J. Lectures on Ethics
• Tab K. Right to Silence
• Tab L. Privilege Claims by the Crown
• Tab M. Bringing and Resisting Challenges to Solicitor-Client Privilege
• Tab N. The Most Important Common Law Evidence Case Since Wray

Volume II (Tabs O-Z):

• Tab O. Admissibility of Evidence of Bad Character and Extrinsic Misconduct
• Tab P. Similar Act Evidence
• Tab Q. Has Ability of Accused to Introduce Co-Accused's Bad Character Gone Too Far?
• Tab R. A Roundtable Discussion of Difficult Ethical Problems
• Tab S. Lectures on Opinion Evidence
• Tab T. Admissibility of Evidence from Searches of Cell Phones and Electronic Devices
• Tab U. Use of Prior Inconsistent Statements
• Tab V. The Ethics of Witness Preparation
• Tab W. Evidence of After-the-Fact Conduct
• Tab X1. Emerging Areas of Expert Evidence
• Tab X2. Third Party Suspects and Inadequate Police Investigations
• Tab X3. "Mr. Big" Goes to Ottawa
• Tab X4. Testimonial Protections for Vulnerable Witnesses
• Tab Y. Creative Remedies Under s.24(1) of the Charter
• Tab Z. Supreme Court of Canada Report: Did They Get it Right
• Faculty Biographies