Letters rogatory, also called letters of request are a form of international judicial assistance where a court issues a formal written request to a foreign court for assistance in obtaining evidence within the foreign court’s jurisdiction.
Under the Common Law
Letters rogatory or letters of request can be used to gather evidence in BC for proceedings outside of BC or to obtain foreign evidence for BC proceedings. They are based on the principle of international judicial comity and as such, their compliance stems from courtesy and respect and not legal obligation.
Gathering evidence in BC for proceedings outside of BC
- In BC, requests for the enforcement of letters rogatory issued by a foreign court are governed by the provisions of s. 53 of the British Columbia Evidence Act. Federally, requests are made under the Canada Evidence Act section 46.
- Generally, the Canadian courts will assess if the foreign request offends Canadian public policy and consider potential impact a proposed examination could have on a witness. For details regarding the factors relevant to granting or denying requests see Canadian Conflict of Laws, Part II, Chapter 9, available on site at Courthouse Libraries.
Obtaining foreign evidence for BC proceedings
- Rule 7-8(8) -(12) of the BC Supreme Court Civil Rules on depositions governs obtaining letters of request. It is a formal request to the appropriate judicial authorities in another country to order a resident of that jurisdiction to provide oral and documentary evidence for a BC proceeding.
- Rule 7-8(10) states the order under subrule 8 must be in Form 29 and the letter of request referred to in the order must be in Form 30.
- Samples of filed orders and letters of request can be searched in the Pleadings, Motions, and Facta module in Lexis Advance Quicklaw.
As per Hague Convention
The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence in Civil or Commercial Matters allows for contracting countries to obtain evidence from one another via letters of request. Canada is not a signatory to this treaty and the key difference between requests made under the Hague Convention and those made under the common law is that granting letters of request under the Convention is an obligation, not a matter of judicial discretion. Requests must comply with the Hague Conventions’s formal requirements.
According to a 2008 CLE paper, Obtaining Foreign Clinical Records:
While Canada is not a signatory to this international treaty, the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence in Civil or Commercial Matters can nevertheless provide guidance to counsel seeking to obtain foreign clinical records. This international treaty at the very least provides a foundation for international comity between contracting nations, but also provides precedent and guidance for other nations.
Content reviewed October 10, 2025
- Evidence Act, RSBC 1996, c.124 - BC Laws
- Canada Evidence Act, RSC 1985, c. C-5 – Justice Laws
- Supreme Court Civil Rules, BC Reg 168/2009 - BC Laws
- Letters of Request under the Evidence Acts, HCF-75, Conflict of Laws, Halsbury’s Laws of Canada – available on-site at Courthouse Libraries
- Responding to Requests for Evidence from Parties to Foreign Litigation, Paper 5.1, Rules of Court 2009, CLE- Available on-site at Courthouse Libraries
- Obtaining Evidence in Foreign Jurisdictions and Dealing with Foreign Letters of Request in BC, Paper 5, Conflicts Issues 2006, CLE – Available on-site at Courthouse Libraries
- Obtaining Foreign Clinical Records, Paper 3.3, Personal Injury Conference 2008, CLE – Available on-site at Courthouse Libraries
- Multi-jurisdictional Litigation: some hot topics, Civil Litigation Conference 2005, CLE – Available on-site at Courthouse Libraries
- Enforcing American Letters of Request: the fickle Charter guarantee of Evidentiary Immunity, (2015) 52:4 Alberta Law Review, 869 – Available on-site at Courthouse Libraries
- Canadian Conflict of Laws, 7th edition –available on-site at Courthouse Libraries
- Hague Convention on Taking Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters - Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)
